Yes, I also have to ask those questions.
California requires the notary to physically examine the ID
I would be careful about the claim that California requires the notary to physically examine the ID. I wouldnât be a bit surprised if the California SOS put out a statement that looking at an unofficial photo of an ID that the phone owner photographed him/herself isnât good enough. The California law for identifying a person who is giving an acknowledgement, as given in the CA Notary Handbook, states:
(4) Reasonable reliance on the presentation of any one of the following, provided that a
document specifed in subparagraphs (A) to (F), inclusive, shall either be current or have been
issued within fve years and shall contain a photograph and description of the person named
on it, shall be signed by the person, and shall bear a serial or other identifying number:
(A) A valid consular identifcation document issued by a consulate from the applicantâs
country of citizenship, or a valid passport from the applicantâs country of citizenship.
(B) A driverâs license issued by a state other than California or by a Canadian or Mexican
public agency authorized to issue driverâs licenses.
The law says nothing about what form the driver license takes. It doesnât say it has to be a card you can hold in your hand. If the state issues an official driver license that is on a phone, there is nothing in the text of the law that forbids that.
Thank you so much for sharing this.
credible witness 2 , yes I had notarizing without id
Colorado Digital ID app, MyColorado, is the only approved digital driverâs license image we can accept. CO Driver license Regulations say one must also carry the physical license, also, for interactions with law enforcement and the digital version is only useable within Colorado. I have checked with my Secretary of State, who told me I can accept the MyColorado Digital ID as satisfactory evidence of identification. I had someone present her digital ID with a smartphone screen so badly cracked I couldnât read the ID, which I refused to accept. This person did not have her physical ID; in light of the original posterâs situation, has the client not volunteered that her license was suspended, I can think of no way I would know that. Also, we could run into a situation where I license is suspended, but not surrendered. We wouldnât know that either. I think, if the license is suspended and we know it, it wouldnât be valid satisfactory evidence of identification.
Yes I will certainly use it next time.
Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge.
Consider this: If a person walked into your office and asked you to notarize a document, and their only form of ID was a hard copy photo of a driver license⊠would you accept it?
This is a different situation; I cannot accept a photocopy of any identification as satisfactory evidence under any circumstance. The digital ID, for me - My Colorado digital ID, is acceptable according the Drivers License regulations and according to the Secretary of Stateâs office for a notary to use as satisfactory evidence. For me, the question is if the person requesting a notarization only has a digital ID, ie. they do not have a physical drivers license, what situation exists that causes that person to not have their physical drivers license?
In AZ, you must be able to physically look at the original ID, not a copy. ADOT has that version but it is not listed as an option for a notary, according to our manual.
This topic was automatically closed after 2 days. New replies are no longer allowed.