Today the offer was $50 for 6 pages 45 minutes away I countered over double that and got the call to award. Then was told 2 witnesses were required and I could be one and would I be bringing the 2nd at which point I declined the order. I don’t fool with witnesses.
But that an order requiring 2 witnesses was offered at $50 is shocking to me.
I also don’t like orders at 7pm so that was a good escape.
Similarly, I avoid two witness situations UNLESS, I can be one of the witnesses and I am assured by the signers that they can procure a proper witness with sufficient ID. I’ve been burned twice when the signers’ witness didn’t show. I had to walk on one and knock on neighbors’ doors to find the other one.
I’ve turned down thousands of dollars of signings because of this two witness jazz. I don’t like it but witness procurement and payment to is just too much hassle. I believe the originator of the documentation should advise the signers to have witnesses ready and available to help ensure a smooth signing. It makes little sense to me to turn a notary into a recruiter. Maybe there’s something I don’t know.
I totally agree with you on the witnesses., I believe the signer should get their own witnesses. Also 7pm for a signing is late for me too. I got an offer last night for 8:30pm. No way!!
I agree that signers should provide witnesses. And under no circumstances should the fees offered be designed for a notary AND witnesses. But they aren’t making those rules with me in mind so I don’t take those orders. I’ve done a few Florida transactions and what’s funny about that is the hiring party told Title WA didn’t require the witnesses.
No idea what happened when that paperwork reached Florida, but I was told twice witnesses weren’t required on Florida deeds notarized in Washington. I don’t try to tell anyone the law. I only know I completed those signings with no witnesses and got paid on time with no requested do over.
Yeah, I’ll guarantee you that deed didn’t get recorded and got sent back for a re-do; or when title got the deed back and was prepping for recording, they witnessed it in the office.
I received an order request with witnesses this morning. They offered $100. I countered with $135 and got it. When I discovered that witnesses were required due to it being a Florida property, I told them that the signer would have to provide the 2nd witness (I would be one witness as the notary). I spoke to the signer and he had a witness so it’s good to go for tonight. My point is that I will never be responsible for bringing a 2nd witness to a signing. I don’t need that kind of hassle. I’d rather give the job back.
In Florida, a Notary Public may serve as a witness in a notarial act, but I choose not to act as both witness and Public Official during any loan signing or general notary work. When two witnesses are needed, the signer must provide one and I will hire my wife to be the second. If she is not available, the signer must provide their own two witnesses.
This signing service has offered the same order for almost 3 days now. Because no one wants to provide witnesses for a $50 order. Which is a ridiculous ask.
I believe that it is the signer’s responsibility to have their own witnesses. I actually should not act as a witness and a Notary Public/Signing Agent at the same time, therefore, I no longer accept these signing appointments.
Must be Florida! I live here and lately not wanting to pay extra and most think we ride around with our witnesses. All deeds here require an additional witness.