Hi Architer,
Thanks for your response.
I think differently regarding your concern about extenuating circumstances.
When an assignment has extenuating circumstances that were not disclosed to the notary, a fee increase is warranted.
If the lender did not explain the issue to title, then the lender owns the issue and cost.
If title did not explain it to the SS or notary, then title owns the issue and the cost.
If SS did not explain it to the notary, then SS owns the issue and the cost.
When something unusual was not disclose it is common for the notary to be told that their fee canât be changed because it was disclosed to the signer(s). BALONEY!!!
The signers can be given an explanation and a new disclosure; yes, I know that can change the closing date and no one wants to do that.
So alternatively, the lender, title or SS can pay the notaryâs fee increase from their own sources with out impacting the disclosure to the signer(s).
They can charge it off, in their books, to Professional Fees, Office Meals for the staff, Miscellaneous, or what ever they think is best.
The owner of the undisclosed issue just needs to belly up and take the hit.
Notaries are responsible for eating the costs of his/her mistake(s) but, notaries are not responsible for eating the costs of some one elseâs mistakes or oversights.
Alternatively, notaries need to ask questions when accepting an assignment. How many pages, how many signers, what is the actual address, etc.
Sadly, platforms that send out mass requests to 100,000 notaries do not allow us to get the details.
So you asked âhow many pagesâ and SS or title says âI donât knowâ. Then the notary needs to start driving the situation; my fee is $175 for up to 135 pages, 2 signers and 40 miles round trip. Oh yes, scanbacks are an additional fee and most of us are not charging enough to cover the extra work and drive time.
Respectfully,
Guy